Select your language
Select your language
Urgency of the research is related to the need to study the species division and classification of the phenomenon of social space, which defines the demarcation in the understanding of the formation of different types of space, its modalities, as a rule, perceived by man in the duality of dynamics of "space-time" in the picture of his world in a philosophical reflection on the development of human activity in the 21st century.
Target setting. We consider it necessary to study the mechanisms of intuition (as irrational) in activity (as rational, because target formation is its main criterion) and modern humanitarian research based on the philosophical principle of objectivity in the problem field.
Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. The problem of social space has its own traditions and concepts. The studies of J. Boden, Ch. Montesquieu, F. Rattsel and K. Ritter have an important place in solving the problem of social space. In the article we analyze the positions of social-Darwinism of G. Spencer, the work of E. Durkheim, the position of G. Zimmel, T. Parsons and P. Sorokin. We focus on the practical and philosophical views of academician Popov through the prism of an active approach.
The research objective. The necessity to comprehend the phenomenon of memory in social space is specified in such scientific tasks: to comprehend the content of social time, its types, the role of memory mechanisms in the context of social space, to determine the reasons and preconditions for determining the classification of species categories of space in human perception. In our scientific investigation we have focused on the analysis of logic and theory of the external method of memory research according to G. Popov; representation of the theoretical model of memory and its specific designation and figurative constructions, as well as the definition of social space necessary for the analysis of the problem.
The statement of basic materials. If the object of our work is social space, its modalities and species characteristics, the subject is theoretical models that represent the role of mechanisms of memory in social space. The article is aimed to study the phenomenon of memory in social space and assumes the study of memory in the interaction with external environment. The shown result is reflection of the outcomes of systematization of knowledge about the relationship between mechanisms of memory and the phenomenon of formation of social space, which are the result of philosophical reflection on the principles of work of blocks of human memory.
Conclusions. So, in the context of the implementation of the tasks in this article, the following regularities were obtained: firstly, all kinds, types and modalities of the phenomenon of social space perceived by a man is order's reflection of operation of configurations of dynamic and static memory blocks; Secondly, by the example of the analysis of the social space modalities, we presented the heuristic potential of the image model of G. Popov's memory; thirdly, we considered the phenomenon of space, its varieties and correlated these features with the specifics of dynamic and static memory blocks.
Keywords: memory, phenomenology of memory, memory environment, social space, mechanisms of memory, places of memory, logic of memory.
References:
Urgency of the research. Politics as a set of practices and discourses regarding the optimal ordering of public life acquires signs of a certain text with all its features and regularities: with its authorial and subject style, with a combination of both conventionally acceptable and ambiguous accents, conclusions and proposals. However, today we have to state an unfortunate given: the aspect of civilization contexts and subtexts of politics, if it is presented, is only stated and postulated, although in fact it requires lengthy discursive alternatives and coverage of essentially different conceptual approaches, because only in this way we can hope for the argumentative expressiveness of significant paradigmatic differences and their consolidation by means of education at the level of consciousness in the educational sphere in general, and in domestic education in particular.
Target setting. The of research task lies in providing the civilizational context and subtext of policy by instruments of full educational discourse, that will not use "finished truths in the last instance", and will try to learn the difficult relief of this subject field in the way of full discourse, critical analysis and systematic reflection.
Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. The list of conceptual approaches to understanding the subject of research can be structured into four thematic branches, namely: the first research priority concerns the features and regularities of the civilizational approach to the operation of political reality, processes in the political sphere (A. Abulmagd, L. Arispe, H. Ashravi, M. Barg, F. Brodel, V. Galin, B. Erasov, I. Ionov, I. Kefeli, and others); the second research area deals with the phenomenon of political reality in the context of cultural and civilizational continuity, as well as with the essential differences between politics and other social practices (S. Oznobishchev, P. Riker, M. Sarki-siants, V. Sorokina, Ch. Mouffe, Ph. Schmitter, and others); the third thematic branch operates with the intellectual component of politics and the political vocation of the intellectual (A. Dyakov, P. Sloterdike, G. Smith and others); the fourth block of the source base deals with the theoretical and methodological positioning of politics with text that has its genre features, morphology, stylistics, texts and subtexts (I. Kasavin, E. Fidrich, I. Shchirova, E. Goncharova).
The research objective. To analyze the casual links of inadequate mastering of cultural and civilization achievements by the political sphere, to comprehend the ways and means of overcoming this theoretical and praxeological problem.
The statement of basic materials. Politics feels the steady influence of the civilization factor first of all and mainly because for various reasons the way of its existence prevents the careful selection of optimal articulation, argumentation and rhetorical approaches; instead of this, the civilization factor works not so much within the limits of specific and historical priorities, as in a much longer retrospective and perspective.
Unlike politics, for civilization modernity is a minor episode, which becomes meaningful only in the context of some historical continuity and prospects for the future. At the expense of the closest possible association links with the civilization factor, politics tries to legitimize and raise its institutional status and ensure a respectable image. It tries to prove that it also works on the principles of historical continuity, and her argumentatively vulnerable memoranda are not without prospects for the future.
Conclusions. In general, it must be noted that the educational sphere reflects political reality quite formally and passively at the level of stating rather than discursive practices. An indirect consequence of this disadvantage is the undeniable fact that the politicization of the intellectual sphere is much more intense than the intellectualization of the political sphere. In general, the research problems are diverse and multidimensional, and they define only the contours of the problem and need that are enormous in scope as well as social and political consequences.
Keywords: politics as text, evolutionary factors of political practices, civilizational conditionality, cultural and civilizational stereotype, geopolitical analogies, causal links.
References:
Zoreslav Samchuk, Doctor of Sciences (Dr. Hab.) in Philosophy, Senior Researcher (e-mail:
TEXT OF POLICY IN THE BACKGROUND OF CIVILIZATIONAL CONTEXTS AND SUBTEXTS AS A MISSING ELEMENT OF EDUCATIONAL DISCOURSE
DOI 10.33930/ed.2019.5007.24(6)-1
Oleg Maltsev, Multiple PhD (psychology, philosophy), Academician (e-mail:
SOCIAL SPACE AS A CONDITION OF MEMORY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN ACTIVITY
DOI 10.33930/ed.2019.5007.24(6)-2
Volodymyr Savelʹyev, Doctor of Sciences (Dr. Hab.) in History, Professor (e-mail:
Olena Yatsenko, PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor (e-mail:
ADULT EDUCATION AS A STRATEGY FOR "GROWING UP" DEMOCRACY: THE EXPERIENCE OF GERMANY
DOI 10.33930/ed.2019.5007.24(6)-3
DOI 10.33930/ed.2019.5007.24(6)-4
Iryna Khmil, Senior Lecturer (e-mail:
METHODS OF FORMING THE LEGAL COMPETENCE OF FUTURE DOCTORS IN THE PROCESS OF TEACHING MEDICAL LAW
DOI 10.33930/ed.2019.5007.24(6)-5
Nataliia Lopina, PhD in Medically (e-mail:
THE STRUCTURE OF THE COURSE "FUNDAMENTALS OF THE METHODOLOGY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ELECTRONIC COURSE IN THE FIELD OF MEDICAL EDUCATION" AFTER THE INTRODUCTION OF DISTANCE LEARNING DUE TO THE WORLD PANDEMIC COVID-19
DOI 10.33930/ed.2019.5007. 24(6)-6
Victoria Furkalo, PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor (e-mail:
PHILOSOPHICAL BACKGROUND OF RELIGIOUS STUDIES
DOI 10.33930/ed.2019.5007.24(6)-7
Ivan Kunderenko, Teacher of biblical classed (e-mail:
RELIGIOUS (“FAITH-BASED”) EDUCATION IN PROTESTANT EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF UKRAINE: TO THE PROBLEM OF CONCEPT FORMULATION
DOI 10.33930/ed.2019.5007.24(6)-8
Nataliia Mariukhno, Senior Teacher (e-mail:
ISSUE OF THE MEANING OF HUMAN LIFE AND ITS UNDERSTANDING BY IVAN PROKHANOV
DOI 10.33930/ed.2019.5007.24(6)-9
Urgency of the research. The concept of kenosis underwent especial development in 20th-century Russian Orthodox thought, largely due to the scholarly research conducted by V. N. Lossky and archpriest Sergii Bulgakov. The discussion over kenosis between the two scholars is crucial to current theological discourse, especially dogmatic theology.
Target setting. The views of V. N. Lossky and archpriest Sergii Bulgakov on the concept of “kenosis” are in need of a fresh reading and rethinking, in a dialogical mode. Such an approach will allow us to see the advantages and disadvantages of these views and assess their creative potential.
Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. This topic, in varying degrees, was covered in the works of such researchers as: B. Gallagher, R. Williams, Hieromonk Nikolay (Sakharov), A. Papanicolaou, M. Sebo, P. Gavrilyk and others.
The research objective. To critically analyze and compare V. N. Lossky’s and Fr. Sergii Bulgakov’s interpretations of the concept of “kenosis”.
The statement of basic materials. It has been found that the discrepancies between V. N. Lossky’s and archpriest Sergii Bulgakov’s views on kenosis are explained by the fact that these thinkers built their teachings on different methodological foundations, using different sources and tools. For Lossky, kenosis was temporal in nature and was limited to the christological dimension, while for Bulgakov kenosis meant an eternal intrathroic metaphysical reality that manifested itself much earlier and on a much larger scale. If Bulgakov insisted that the Incarnation was determined by ontological necessity (ontological altruism), then Lossky, by contrast, was of the opinion that it was caused by the need to solve the human problem of sin and became possible only due to the free act of the Divine will.
Conclusions. The following conclusions were drawn from the given study: firstly, Lossky intended to conceptualize kenosis in unity and in harmony with the patristic tradition; Bulgakov, on the other hand, advanced his speculative view of kenosis, one that lacks any solid theological basis. Secondly, Lossky’s understanding of kenosis has stronger exegetical support than that of Bulgakov’s.
Keywords: V. N. Lossky, archpriest Sergii Bulgakov, kenosis, the Trinity, God’s incarnation.
References: