author: Oleksii Kuznietsov


Urgency of the research. Integration of physical into virtual, real-sensual into imaginary-digital, shift of emphasis from offline to online and etc. objectively state irreversible changes in almost all spheres of life: public administration, economy, energy, military industry, scientific and technological progress, national security, telecommunications and legal sectors, which transforms the information society into digital. It is undeniable that any transformations are characterized by an increase in a certain range of opportunities and are accompanied by an appropriate level of risks and dangers. Thus, the formation of the security dimension of civilizational changes in the context of social digitalization and determines the relevance of this scientific research.

Target setting. The emergence of the phenomenon of digital inequality, cybercrime, ideology of the hacker movement and the rapid development of high technology, artificial intelligence have led to the need to create safe conditions and appropriate protocols related to the humanistic, legal and moral side of this issue.

Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. The security dimension of social change in the context of digitalization and multidisciplinary nature of this scientific field is considered in the works of the following foreign and domestic scientists: V. Voronkova, O. Karpenko, T. Myskevich, M. Hermann, K. White, F. Cruz-Jesus, T. Oliveira, F. Bacao, K. Schwab, G. Chmeruk, O. Kyvliuk and other famous scientists.

The research objective. To consider possible risks and theoretically justify the need to create a safe dimension of transformation processes in society in the context of digitalization.

The statement of basic material. The globalization processes associated with the fourth industrial revolution («Industry 4.0» - digital transformation) are gaining momentum in the context of social digitalization, which requires, in our opinion, the adoption of appropriate strategic management decisions and their implementation to prevent possible dangers. In addition to the institutional support of digitalization processes and the creation of a digital technology market, there is a need for motivated consumer activity of the "digital product" and both collective and personal awareness of the possible prospects and consequences of these transformations.

Conclusions. Modern transformation processes in society, associated with the digitalization of almost all spheres of human life, accompanied by a number of risks and dangers: cybercrime, blurring the boundaries between physical and digital security, digital inequality, etc., require scientific and theoretical reasoning and conceptualization of security dimension in the context of digitalization of society. Among the imperatives and potentially safe ways of digitalization are: standardization and institutionalization of digital dimension, the formation of digital culture and ethics of electronic-digital communication, modernization of training of programming and cybersecurity, implementation of national state policy and law in digitalization, creating favorable conditions for the digital economy and etc.

Keywords: security dimension, digitalization, digital society, globalization, digital inequality, cyber security, transformation.

 

References:

  1. Karpenko, O 2017. ‘Cifrove vryaduvannya: imperativi realizaciyi v Ukrayini (Digital governance: implementation imperatives in Ukraine)’, Aktualni problemi derzhavnogo upravlinnya, Vip. 3, s. 57-61.
  2. Kvitka, S, Novichenko, N, Gusarevich, N, Piskoha, N, Bardah, O, & Demoshenko, G 2020. ‘Perspektivni napryamki cifrovoyi transformaciyi publichnogo upravlinnya (Perspective directions of digital transformation of public administration)’, Aspekti publichnogo upravlinnya, № 8 (4), s. 129–146. Dostupno: <https://doi.org/10.15421/152087>. [20 Sichen 2021].
  3. Kivlyuk, O & Mordous, I 2020. ‘Didzhitalizaciya osvitnogo prostoru: perspektivi ta riziki (Digitalization of educational space: prospects and risks)’, Materiali Mizhnarodnoyi naukovo-praktichnoyi konferenciyi «Formuvannya koncepciyi cifrovizaciyi yak chinnik rozvitku kreativnosti osobistosti ta yiyi vpliv na rozvitok lyudskogo j socialnogo kapitalu», 26-27 listopad, Red.-uporyadnik: d.filsof.n., prof., VG Voronkova, Zaporizhzhya: ZNU, 284 s.
  4. Koncepciya rozvitku cifrovoyi ekonomiki ta suspilstva Ukrayini na 2018-2020 roki (The concept of development of the digital economy and society of Ukraine for 2018-2020), 2018. Shvaleno rozporyadzhennyam Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrayini vid 17 sichnya 2018 r. № 67-r. Dostupno: <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/67-2018-%D1% 80#Text> [20 Sichen 2021].
  5. Miskevich, T 2019. ‘Cifrova nerivnist u suchasnomu suspilstvi: ukrayinskij vimir svitovih tendencij (Digital inequality in modern society: the Ukrainian dimension of world trends)’, Ukrayinskij zhurnal z bibliotekoznavstva ta informacijnih nauk, Vip. 3. s. 87-107. Dostupno: <https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.3.2019.169673/>. [20 Sichen 2021].
  6. Chmeruk, G 2020. ‘Cifrovizaciya – trend svitovogo rozvitku, yakij viznachaye rozvitok ekonomiki i suspilstva (Digitalization is a trend of world development that determines the development of the economy and society)’, Ekonomichnij prostir, № 153, s. 18-24. Dostupno: <https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/153-3>. [20 Sichen 2021].
  7. Cruz-Jesus, F, Oliveira, T, & Bacao, F 2018. ‘The Global Digital Divide: Evidence and Drivers’, Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 26, 2, р. 1-26. Aviable from: <https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.2018040101>. [20 January 2021].
  8. Hermann, M, Pentek, T & Otto, B 2016. ‘Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios’, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, USA, p. 3928-3937. Aviable from: <https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.488>. [20 January 2021].
  9. Hilbert, M 2016. ‘The bad news is that the digital access divide is here to stay: Domestically installed bandwidths among 172 countries for 1986–2016’, Telecommunications Policy, 40 (6), р. 567-581.
  10. Schwab, K 2017. ‘The fourth industrial revolution’, Portfolio Penguin, 192 p.
  11. Whyte, C 2018. ‘Crossing the Digital Divide: Monism, Dualism and the Reason Collective Action is Critical for Cyber Theory Production’, Politics and Governance, Vol.6, № 2, с. 73-82. Aviable from: <https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i2.1338>. [20 January 2021].